Weekly Reflection #2 – Generative AI
This week in tech class we explored generative AI, and my feelings around it have evolved more than I expected. Initially, I was quite wary of these tools. I worried that generative AI takes away from human creativity and relies heavily on the work of artists, writers, and creators without always giving proper credit. The idea that students (and adults) could rely on AI to do the thinking for them felt uncomfortable, especially in an educational context where creativity and critical thinking are so important.
However, through discussion and research, I’ve started to see generative AI as a tool that needs to be taught thoughtfully rather than avoided entirely. When used intentionally, it can support learning instead of replacing it. As a future teacher, I can see how AI could be helpful for lesson planning, generating ideas, differentiating activities, or creating evaluation rubrics, saving time that could then be spent supporting students more directly. The key difference is teaching students how to use AI critically and ethically, rather than allowing it to become a shortcut that replaces learning. I feel that the image below encapsulates how we can hopefully help fuel children’s creativity with technology, instead of letting it do the thinking for them.

Another important layer of this conversation is the environmental impact of generative AI. Large AI systems require significant energy and water to run and cool data centres, which contributes to resource use and environmental strain. While a single AI prompt may seem insignificant, the cumulative impact of millions of users worldwide is substantial. This raises important questions about sustainability and responsible use, especially as these technologies continue to expand.
Overall, my perspective on generative AI has shifted from skepticism to cautious acceptance. I still believe there are real concerns around creativity, ethics, and environmental impact, but I also recognize the value of teaching students how to engage with AI responsibly. Rather than banning it outright, educators have an opportunity to guide students in understanding its limits, questioning its outputs, and using it in ways that support, rather than replace, meaningful learning.
Kaitlyn, a good summary of your thoughts, with supporting links and an image. Caution is definitely the way to approach Generative AI, but also predictive AI. Yes, we cannot escape from an AI-saturated environment. We also have a responsibility for how we help our students navigate this new world, ethically and responsibly. For guidance, we look to policies and practices supported by schools and districts that we must be in step with. In the meantime, we can use GenAI to support our development of instructional materials. If we are teaching about AI, we definitely need to experience it ourselves first.